Happy Monday! Friday’s questions are here. The answers follow today’s Honor Roll.
- Karen Allen
- Evan Barquist, Montroll, Backus & Oettinger
- Penny Benelli, Dakin & Benelli
- Alberto Bernabe, Professor, John Marshall Law School
- Honorable John M. Conroy, United States Magistrate Judge, District of Vermont
- Erin Gilmore, Ryan Smith & Carbine
- Laura Gorsky
- Bob Grundstein
- Keith Kasper, McCormick, Fitzpatrick, Kasper & Burchard
- Jeanne Kennedy, JB Kennedy Associates, Mother of the Blogger
- Thomas Kester, Assistant General Counsel, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Vermont
- Aileen Lachs, Mickenburg, Dunn, Lachs & Smith
- Pam Loginsky, Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys
- Lon McClintock, McClintock Law Offices
- Jack McCullough, Project Director, Vermont Legal Aid Mental Health Law Project
- Hal Miller, First American
- Herb Ogden, Ogden Law Offices
- Thomas Wilkinson, Jr., Cozen O’Connor
- Peter Young, General Counsel, Vermont Rail System
How long must a lawyer keep records of funds that belonged to clients or third persons and that the lawyer held in connection with a representation?
- A. 6 years from the termination of the representation. V.R.Pr.C. 1.15(a)(1)
- B. The rules are silent on this issue.
The following are exceptions to a particular rule.
- to establish a claim or defense in a controversy between the lawyer and client;
- to establish a defense to a criminal charge or civil claim against the lawyer based upon conduct in which the client was involved; or,
- to respond to allegations in any proceeding concerning the lawyer’s representation of the client.
Generally, what does the rule prohibit?
Disclosing information relating to the representation of a client. The exceptions listed appear in Rule 1.6(c)(3) and, collectively, are often referre to as “the self-defense exception.”
Lawyer represents Client. Lawyer calls Witness to testify. Witness completed his testimony and the court recessed for the day. Preparing for the next day of trial, Lawyer comes to realize that Witness offered material evidence that was false.
Which is most accurate?
- A. Lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures. V.R.Pr.C. 3.3(a)(3)
- B. Lawyer need not correct the record since it was Witness and not Client.
- C. Lawyer’s duties are different depending on whether the case is criminal or civil.
- D. Lawyer must withdraw.
Comments 10 and 11 are instructive.
Lawyer called me with an inquiry. I listened, then said, “it’s okay as long as it does not imply a connection with a government agency or public or charitable legal services organization and is not otherwise false or misleading.”
What did Lawyer call to discuss?
- A. Using a trade name as a firm name. V.R.Pr.C. 7.5(a)
- B. Organizing a pro bono clinic staffed by volunteer lawyers.
- C. Using an undercover investigator.
- D. Conflicts of interest that arise when moving to & from government practice.
As readers know, I’m a huge proponent of attorney well-being and finding interests outside the law. For me, I love running.
Earlier this week, an assistant public defender had to undergo emergency surgery after suffering a serious injury while taking a selfie as he participated in a famous “running” event. Here’s what one of his co-workers said to the press:
- “As an office we encourage our employees to pursue outside interests and explore their passions. For many it’s traveling, and we think such pursuits are critical to the general wellness of our entire . We are relieved the incident was not more serious and we are looking forward to [the lawyer’s] return.”
Name the “running” event that the lawyer was participating in when he was injured.
The Running of the Bulls, which occurs on the final day of Pamplona’s San Fermin Festival. I blogged about the incident here. The clip from The Breakfast Club summarizes my feelings on running in the event.
Professor Alberto Bernabe, a regular member of the Honor Roll, has actually attended the event. He sent me this picture of the ring.