Many thanks to the Young Lawyers Division of the Vermont Bar Association for putting on another fantastic event in Montreal this weekend. It was great to see so many people in-person. And how about that weather?!?! Count me as a fan of an April/May Thaw!
Friday’s questions are here. The answers follow today’s Honor Roll.
- Karen Allen, Karen Allen Law
- Evan Barquist, Montroll Oettinger Barquist
- Penny Benelli, Dakin & Benelli
- Alberto Bernabe, Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago Law
- Corinne Deering, Paul Frank + Collins
- Benjamin Gould, Paul Frank + Collins
- Robert Grundstein
- Keith Kasper, McCormick Fitzpatrick Kasper & Burchard
- Jeanne Kennedy, JB Kennedy Associates, Mother of the Blogger
- John T. Leddy, McNeil Leddy & Sheahan
- Tom Little, Little & Cicchetti
- Jack McCullough, Project Director, Mental Health Law Project, Vermont Legal Aid
- Hal Miller, First American Title Insurance, Hawaii Agency State Counsel
- Herb Ogden, Esq.
- Margaret Olnek, Divorce Coach, Assistant Professor, Vermont Law School
- Jonathan Teller-Elsberg, Sheehey Furlong & Behm
- Jason Warfield, J.D.
- Thomas Wilkson, Jr., Cozen & O’Connor
Lawyer works at Firm. If Lawyer has a conflict of interest that prohibits Lawyer from representing Client, which type of conflict is least likely to be imputed to the other attorneys in Lawyer’s firm? A conflict that arises from:
- A. Lawyer’s representation of a former client.
- B. Lawyer’s current representation of another client.
- C. a personal interest of Lawyer’s. V.R.Pr.C. 1.10(a)
- D. trick question. In VT, all conflicts are imputed to others in the same firm.
Can a lawyer accept compensation from someone other than the client?
- A. Yes, but only if the payor is related to the client.
- B. Yes, but only if the payor is the client’s insurance company or employer.
- C. Yes, if the client gives informed consent, the payor doesn’t interfere with the lawyer-client relationship, and information relating to the representation of the client is not disclosed to the payor except as authorized by the rule on client confidences. V.R.Pr.C. 1.8(f).
- D. A & B.
Under Vermont’s rules, if a lawyer reasonably believes that a client intends to commit an act that will result in the death of or substantial bodily harm to the client, the lawyer ____:
- A. must disclose client’s intention.
- B. must not disclose the client’s intention.
- C. may disclose the client’s intention. V.R.Pr.C. 1.6(c); See, Cmt. .
- D. It depends on how old the client is.
Lawyer called me with an inquiry related to a potential conflict between a prospective client and a former client. We discussed the distinction between the lawyer’s general knowledge of the former client’s policies and practices, versus the lawyer’s knowledge of specific facts gained during the prior representation that are relevant to the new matter.
As such, it’s most likely that Lawyer’s former client is _________:
- A. a minor.
- B. an organization. V.R.Pr.C. 1.9, Cmt. .
- C. deceased.
- D. represented by a law firm that once employed Lawyer.
The Thaw is on my mind.
With “most” defined as “all,” most of my knowledge of the British Commonwealth’s legal system comes from tv and movies. Last week, I binged Anatomy of a Scandal. Set in England, here are the lawyers who appeared in a criminal trial:
A few years ago, I loved the Australian show Rake. Here’s the star:
So, if I bump into a Canadian lawyer in Montreal, I might ask the lawyer if they have a peruke. It’s altogether possible that the lawyer will have no idea what “peruke” means. If so, what’s the word I’ll use instead? The more common term for a “peruke?”
Negative infinity points for any smart aleck comments that I should get my own a peruke.
A wig that English barristers wear in court. Perukes are no longer worn in court in Canada.