Sometimes it’s funny what we miss.
As I type, it’s 4:31 AM. In the spring & summer, the noise would’ve begun by now. The damn birds would be full throttle into their daily concert. Given my proclivity not to appreciate what I have in the moment I have it, I’d roll over and yell “be quiet!” as I hope for 29 more minutes of sleep. Then, I’d grudgingly arise, have a quick coffee, and groggily walk out of the garage to run.
And I’d love it.
I love the light that comes between summer’s nights & dawns. I love how cool even the hottest of days feel that early in the morning. I love the stretch of my runs that includes an incredible view of the sun rising over the mountains.
Today, there’s no noise. Even if there was, I wouldn’t be able to hear it. For as surely as my stockings are hung by the chimney with care, my windows are sealed shut to keep out this frigid air.
As for a morning run, the sun remains almost 3 hours from rising (and seems but 4 or 5 from setting.) Further, per my weather app, Williston currently “feels like -6.” Not exactly my jam. So, the plan is to run indoors. In a few minutes, I’ll hop into my car for the dark drive to the gym and the dizzying, mind-numbing effect of laps around a track that measures an 1/8th of a mile and is pretty much devoid of natural light.
Oh how I miss those damn birds and their noise!
Alas, there’s hope. Beginning Sunday, each day will be longer than last. Yet another reason why this is, truly, the most wonderful time of the year.
Happy Holidays and onto the quiz!
PS – I really do hang stockings:
- None. Open book, open search engine, text-a-friend.
- Exception: Question 5. We try to play that one honest.
- Unless stated otherwise, the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct apply
- Team entries welcome, creative team names even more welcome.
- E-mail answers to email@example.com
- I’ll post the answers & Honor Roll on Monday
- Please don’t use the “comment” feature to post your answers
- Please consider sharing the quiz with friends & colleagues
- Share on social media. Hashtag it – #fiveforfriday
At a CLE, visions of sugarplums distract you. Yet, you vaguely hear me say something to the effect of “the rule relaxes the duty of loyalty owed to that person, but not the duty to maintain that person’s confidences.”
When I said, “that person,” I was referring to:
- A. a client who sues a lawyer for malpractice.
- B. a client who files a disciplinary complaint against a lawyer.
- C. a prospective client who met with but did not retain a lawyer.
- D. all of the above.
Attorney called me with an inquiry. I listened, then replied, “the rule requires you to take reasonable remedial measures. A comment to the rule says that the first step is to remonstrate with your client.”
Given my response, it’s most likely that Attorney called because Attorney:
- A. Learned that Client had presented false evidence to a tribunal.
- B. Received information from opposing counsel that she reasonably believes opposing counsel inadvertently produced.
- C. Discovered that her law firm previously represented the other party in a substantially related matter.
- D. Communicated with a represented person without the consent of that person’s lawyer.
Lawyer called me with an inquiry. I listened, then said “yes, for the sole purpose of paying service charges or fees on the account, and only in an amount necessary for that purpose.”
What did Lawyer call to ask?
Rule 3.4(a) prohibits a lawyer from unlawfully obstructing another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully altering, destroying or concealing material that has potential evidentiary value.
Earlier this week, some other lawyers and I met with the lawyers participating in the VBA’s Incubator Program. Among other things, we discussed the legal ethics of social media. We mentioned that, generally, a lawyer does not violate Rule 3.4 by advising a client to delete or “take down” information from social media, so long as ____________________.
- A. the conduct does not constitute spoliation of evidence.
- B. the conduct is not otherwise illegal.
- C. the lawyer takes appropriate action to advise the client to preserve the information should it become discoverable or relevant.
- D. All of the above.
There’s a holiday movie that involves questionable conduct by the prosecutor, defense attorney, and judge.
The movie focuses on Kris, a seasonal employee at a department store in New York City. Kris got into hot water after whacking a fellow employee over the head with an umbrella. Soon thereafter, the state initiated involuntary commitment proceedings. The prosecutor’s entire case rested on Kris’s claims to be someone who, according to the state, did not exist.
Fred represented Kris. He did so as much for his romantic interest in Doris, Kris’s boss, as for his interest in providing Kris with competent and diligent representation.
In the end, Judge Henry X. Harper refused to commit Kris. His decision was based on several factors, including:
- a politician’s ex parte communication to the judge that the judge would certainly lose his re-election bid if he ruled that the person Kris claimed to be did not exist; and,
- 21 bags of “dead letters” addressed to the person who Kris claimed to be. The United States Post Office delivered them to Kris at the courthouse during the hearing.
Judge Harper concluded that if the federal government (the Post Office) agrees that Kris is who he claims to be, then the state has no business saying otherwise.
Following the hearing, Fred asked Doris to marry him.
In the movie, who does Kris claim to be?