I’m about to hit the road to speak at two CLEs: the VBA Bankruptcy Section’s Holiday CLE in Killington, followed this afternoon by the Defender General’s training in Montpelier. Last night, I had visions of rising early and using today’s introduction to weave for you a magical story tying this week’s number (184), to today’s date, and, eventually, to The Irishman.
I said “visions.” I did not say – or do anything to indicate – that I had managed to transform my visions to a draft, not to mention a final product.
But you know what that makes me?
Onto the quiz!
- None. Open book, open search engine, text-a-friend.
- Exception: Question 5. We try to play that one honest.
- Unless stated otherwise, the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct apply
- Team entries welcome, creative team names even more welcome.
- E-mail answers to email@example.com
- I’ll post the answers & Honor Roll on Monday
- Please don’t use the “comment” feature to post your answers
- Please consider sharing the quiz with friends & colleagues
- Share on social media. Hashtag it – #fiveforfriday
If Lawyer’s continued representation of a client will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Lawyer _____________.
- A. may withdraw.
- B. shall withdraw.
- C. oddly, this situation is not mentioned in the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.
Lawyer called me with an inquiry involving Client and Other. I listened. Then, I said:
“it’s ok as long as:
- Client gives informed consent;
- Other doesn’t interfere with your professional judgment or your relationship with Client; and,
- you don’t share any information about the representation with Other absent Client’s consent.”
What is Other’s involvement with this situation?
Later today at the Bankruptcy CLE, I’m going to mention “the 6 Cs of Legal Ethics.” Competence, Communication, Confidentiality, Conflicts, Candor, and Civility.
There’s actually a 7th “C”, but the word does not appear anywhere in the rules. Rather, it’s the word we use to refer to a violation of the duty to hold property of clients and third persons separate from the lawyer’s own property.
What’s this 7th “C”?
Lawyer represents Kennedy. This morning, Kennedy gave Lawyer a bank check for $6,000 to pay for various expenses related to the representation, including legal fees owed to Lawyer. Lawyer did not have time to make it to the bank today but intends to deposit Kennedy’s check on Monday.
Honestly, Kennedy is a pain. He hasn’t paid in a long time and has a hefty outstanding bill.
Lawyer’s trust account holds funds that belong to clients other than Kennedy. This afternoon, Lawyer wants (finally) to pay herself for legal services provided to Kennedy by transferring funds from the trust account to her operating account. Then, on Monday, Lawyer intends to replace those funds by depositing Kennedy’s bank check into trust.
Which is most accurate?
- A. Good plan, but only because it’s a bank check, not a personal check.
- B. Good plan, if Lawyer charges Kennedy a reasonable fee.
- C. Bad plan, because the bank check is for more than $5,000.
- D. Bad plan, because the disbursement would take place before Lawyer deposits Kennedy’s bank check into her trust account.
Today is the 154th anniversary of the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the amendment that abolished slavery.
One of the members of Congress who was instrumental in drafting and passing the 13th Amendment was a “radical republican” who was born & raised in Vermont. After leaving Vermont, he practiced law in Pennsylvania. As a trial lawyer, legend has it that he responded to a judge’s warning that he was “manifesting contempt” by saying “Sir, I’m doing my best to conceal it.”
In 2012, Tommy Lee Jones played him in a movie about Abraham Lincoln and won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor .
Name the lawyer who was born & raised in Vermont and who played a critical role in drafting, passing, and ratifying the 13th Amendment.