Welcome to #151!
Bacardi isn’t today’s topic. I can’t stand rum.
Today’s topic is my brother.
My brother is Patrick Francis Kennedy. Some of you may know him as “The First Brother.” That’s how I list him when he earns a spot on the #fiveforfriday Honor Roll. No, he’s not a lawyer. He’s simply incredibly smart and can do legal research. When he feels like it, he submits a perfect 5 for 5. Give him a few days and he’d argue your motion to dismiss.
Then he’d argue opposing counsel’s position and leave the judge with a difficult decision.
I’m not sure how best to describe Patrick. He is a lot of things.
Patrick makes his living as some sort of coder. Or maybe he’s a programmer or a network engineer. Honestly, his professional world is so Greek to me that I’m not exactly sure what he does. But he’s damn good at it.
Patrick used to be in the Army. He drove tanks. Then, he did something, I can’t remember where or what, that exposed his tech competence to a superior officer. That was the end of driving tanks. They whisked him off to West Point to run systems and such. Now, he works for MyWebGrocer.
Patrick is also a top-notch chef. He’s won multiple chili contests, an accomplishment that actually works to mask how adept he is at cooking anything & everything. Not only does he know the precise temperature at which the various meats are best served, he’s knows how to order the right wine for each. And how to make the right cheese for each wine. Don’t like wine? He brews beer.
My brother can fish & hunt. He can explain how a piano works, how to attack a zone defense, and how the Union Army prevailed at Gettysburg. He is conversant in Spanish and Italian. He’s traveled extensively in Europe, been stationed on the DMZ, and coached a middle school basketball team to a tournament championship.
While wearing a tuxedo.
He can capably discuss Cornwallis at Yorktown, the aerodynamics at Daytona, and the paradoxes of time travel. He could do your kid’s calculus homework then show her little sister how to build a leprechaun trap. Afterwards, he’d let you choose whether to have him teach you how to make candles, brisket, or reservations for a Papal mass.
Patrick has constructed compelling arguments that Ignatius J. Reilly is literature’s greatest character, Rock of Ages is Broadway’s greatest musical, and Rick Burleson is Boston’s greatest shortstop. He was the only Vermonter among the 25 finalists for the President of Red Sox Nation.
He doesn’t cheat at board games or throw tantrums when he loses. (Hello bar counsel!) He’d crush you in Trivial Pursuit or Jeopardy, but then lie to you that he was lucky to do so.
I could go on & on about my brother. Nothing I’ve listed should be construed to indicate that something I omitted is not in his wheelhouse. Further, if my description of him seems random, well, it is. Because that’s him: the rare person who knows so much about so much that it makes those of us who aren’t so smart (or interesting) wonder “how does he know so much about so many random things?”
But the things that he knows and can do are not why he’s important to me. Without diving into detail, I’ll leave you with this.
Patrick is my younger brother. By 18 months. For his entire life, he’s had my back, unconditionally. 24/7/365. If you have a brother, you know what that means.
I wish I was more like him. As a person, and as a brother.
My brother is a remarkable person with a fascinating variety of talents, interests, and areas of knowledge. Everything I’ve shared about him is true. Yet, there’s no more accurate way to describe him than as the best brother in the world.
Oh, one other thing, Patrick Francis Kennedy was born on February 15.
Happy birthday bro!
Onto the quiz!
- None. Open book, open search engine, text/phone/email-a-friend.
- Exception – but one that is loosely enforced – #5 isn’t open book. (“loosely enforced” = “aspirational”)
- Unless stated otherwise, the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct apply
- Team entries welcome, creative team names even more welcome.
- E-mail answers to michael.kennedy@
- I’ll post the answers & Honor Roll on Monday
- Please don’t use the “comment” feature to post your answers
- Please consider sharing the quiz with friends & colleagues
- Please consider sharing the quiz on social media. Hashtag it – #fiveforfriday
Which doesn’t belong with the others?
- A. Keep the client reasonably informed about the status of a matter.
- B. Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.
- C. As far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-attorney relationship with the client.
- D. Explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation,
Yesterday at a CLE, my answer to a question included the following words & phrases:
- same as or substantially related to;
- materially adverse
- informed consent, confirmed in writing
You should assume that I accurately quoted the applicable rule. Given that assumption, the question related to the rule on:
- A. Concurrent conflicts of interest.
- B. Conflicts of interest & former clients.
- C. Commingling
- D. Prospective clients.
“A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.”
- A. True. That’s a rule.
- B. True. That’s in one of the comments to the rule on diligence.
- C. True. That’s in one of the comments to the rule on fees.
- D. It’d be nice, but it doesn’t say that anywhere in the rules or their comments.
The phrase “without fee or expectation of fee” is in the rule on:
- A. Withdrawing from a representation.
- B. Reasonable fees.
- C. Referral fees.
- D. Pro Bono.
Yesterday reminded me of this question.
Lawrence Mattingly practiced law in Illinois. Once, he arranged a meeting between a client and federal agents/prosecutors who were trying to build a tax evasion case against the client. During the meeting, the client claimed “I’ve never had much of an income.”
Later, Attorney Mattingly provided Treasury agents with a letter in which he conceded that his client had, in fact, earned a substantial income over the previous 4 years. The “Mattingly Letter” was admitted at trial and used as evidence against the client. The client was convicted and sent to prison.
Who was the client?