Welcome to Monday!
Friday’s questions are here. The answers follow today’s honor roll.
- Karen Allen
- Matthew Anderson, Pratt Vreeland Kennelly & White
- The Bad News Barristers
- Penny Benelli, Dakin & Benelli
- Evan Barquist, Montroll, Backus & Oettinger
- Andrew Delaney, Martin & Associates
- Doug DiSabito, State’s Attorney, Grand Isle County
- Cary Dube, Bergeron, Paradis, Fitzpatrick
- Bob Grundstein
- Keith Kasper, McCormick, Fitzpatrick, Kasper & Burchard
- Jeanne Kennedy, Mom of the Blogger
- Nicole Killoran, Professor, JD Externship Program, Vermont Law School
- John Leddy, McNeil, Leddy, & Sheahan
- Pam Loginsky, Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys
- Kevin Lumpkin, Sheehey Furlong & Behm
- Hal Miller, First American
- Thomas Wilkinson, Jr., Cozen O’Connor
Fill in the blanks. The same phrase goes in each blank.
When providing pro bono legal services, a substantial majority of the 50 hours should be provided to persons of limited means or certain organizations designed to serve persons of limited means.
That’s the phrase in Rule 6.1 For a definition, see Comment .
This is a “what am I” question:
- In Bar Counsel Universe, I’m often referred to as “unbundled legal services;”
- I am a way to help provide access to legal services for those who might not be able to afford a lawyer.
- I am specifically authorized by Rules for Family Proceedings and the Rules of Civil Procedure
- I am specifically authorized by the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct
- Under the Rules of Professional Conduct, I am allowed only if (a) I am reasonable under the circumstances, and (b) the client gives informed consent.
What am I?
I ama limited representation. See, Rule 1.2(c).
Lawyer called me with an inquiry involving Client and Other. I listened. Then, I said:
“it’s ok as long as:
- Client gives informed consent;
- there’s no interference with your professional judgment or your relationship with Client; and,
- you don’t share any information about the representation with Other absent Client’s consent.”
What is Other’s involvement with this situation?
Other is paying Lawyer. See, Rule 1.8(f).
Later today, I’m speaking to the New Hampshire Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
For a criminal defense lawyer, which rule should spring to mind if a plea deal is conditioned upon the lawyer’s client waiving claims of ineffective assistance of counsel? The rule on:
- A. Candor to the Tribunal
- B. Meritorious Claims & Contentions
- C. Client Confidences
- D. Conflicts of Interest
Several advisory opinions have reached the same conclusion: the criminal defense lawyer’s personal interests conflict with the client’s and, in addition, implicate the rule that prohibits a lawyer from asking a client to agree to limit the lawyer’s liability unless the client is represented by counsel. See, Rules 1.7(a)and 1.8(h). For more, see Pennsylvania Bar Association Formal Opinion 2014-100, provided by Thomas Wilkinson, a regular member of the honor roll.
Speaking of Vermont & New Hampshire . . .
In 2012, Tommy Lee Jones was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. The nomination was for his role in Lincoln. He played a Pennsylvania lawyer who was elected to Congress as a “Radical Republican,” chaired the Ways & Means Committee during the Civil War, and whose fierce opposition to slavery was instrumental in the passage of the 13th and 14th Amendments.
My favorite quote attributed to him? As a trial lawyer, and in response to a judge who warned that he was manifesting contempt: “Sir, I am doing my best to conceal it.”
Oh, by the way, the Pennsylvania lawyer was born and raised in Vermont, then attended college in New Hampshire.