Oops. I got so excited about this post that I published it prematurely. Sorry about that. Here’s the official version.
Welcome to the final #fiveforfriday before Labor Day. Summer I hardly knew ye!
I hope you get out and enjoy the weekend. I’m visiting my dad in Flat Rock, NC, home of The Hubba Hubba Smokehouse, the official BBQ joint of Ethical Grounds. And what goes best with BBQ?
That’s right – running & college football!
(Actually, beer, but that doesn’t fit my story. However, speaking of beer & NC, I recommend Asheville Brewing Company’s Perfect Day IPA).
Anyhow, after tomorrow’s Apple Festival 8K, my dad and I are heading to SC for our our first visit to Death Valley. And speaking of 8Ks, here’s a tip to you new runners: the easiest way to run a PR is to race a distance you’ve never raced before. Gotta love this 8K!
To the quiz!
- None. Open book, open search engine, text-a-friend.
- Exception: Question 5. We try to play that one honest.
- Unless stated otherwise, the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct apply
- Team entries welcome, creative team names even more welcome.
- E-mail answers to michael.kennedy@
- I’ll post the answers & Honor Roll on Monday
- Please don’t use the “comment” feature to post your answers
- Please consider sharing the quiz with friends & colleagues
- Share on social media. Hashtag it – #fiveforfriday
The rules do not require lawyers to have succession plans. However, a comment to a particular rule suggests that it’s a violation for a sole practitioner not to have a plan that designates another lawyer to review the solo’s files and contact the solo’s clients in the event of the solo’s death, disability, or unavailability. It’s the rule on:
- A. Diligence
- B. Communication
- C. Conflicts of Interest
- D. Safekeeping Client Property
Valerie and Eddie divorced many years ago. Eddie is over a year in arrears on court-ordered spousal maintenance payments.
Valerie asks Lawyer to represent her in a motion to enforce the order. She cannot afford Lawyer’s fee and asks Lawyer to take the case on a contingent fee basis. Lawyer agrees. You may assume that Lawyer does not have any conflicts that prohibit Lawyer from representing Valerie.
Which is most accurate?
- A. If the contingent fee agreement is reasonable & reduced to writing, it does not violate the rules.
- B. Lawyer has violated the rules. Contingent fees are banned in domestic cases.
- C. There will not be a violation unless or until Lawyer attempts to collect a contingent fee from Valerie.
- D. There is no violation because it was Valerie, the client, who proposed the contingent fee.
Lawyer represents Organization. Lawyer leaves Organization for private practice.
True or false: Lawyer’s general knowledge of Organization’s practices and procedures ordinarily will preclude Lawyer from representing a party adverse to Organization.
Rule 8.4 prohibits some types of conduct that do not involve the practice of law. Although it no longer appears in the text of the rule, what’s the 2-word term used to draw the distinction between non law-related conduct that violates the rules and non law-related conduct that does not? Conduct involving ” ________ ___________.”
This is a fictional scenario. A prop device, if you will. Play along.
I received an ethics complaint from a woman complaining how her brother was treated in a criminal case. The thrust of her complaint was that her brother was framed for the murder of his best friend, Andy, who had just confessed to an affair with her brother’s “cheatin’ wife.”
Referring to her brother’s defense attorney, she wrote that her brother never should’ve “trusted his soul to no backwoods southern lawyer.” She alleged that the proceeding was “a make believe trial” and that the “judge in this town has got blood stains on his hands.”
Interestingly, her brother WAS framed! In fact, the sister is the one who did it! Not only did she admit to killing Andy, she wrote that her brother’s “cheatin’ wife had never left town and that’s one body that’ll never be found.”
It’s the first complaint I’ve ever received in which the complainant confessed to a crime.
Anyhow, Vermont’s Professional Responsibility Program and Judicial Conduct Board don’t have jurisdiction over the defense attorney and judge.
Name the state to which I referred the complainant.