Week 67. A perfect week to honor the 50th anniversary of 1967’s The Impossible Dream.
To the quiz we go!
But first, I interrupt my regularly scheduled blog for an important announcement:
- Congratulations LAURA GORSKY!!! Laura is a long-time reader and frequent member of the #fiveforfriday Honor Roll. She’s been working as a paralegal for David Sunshine for many years. This week, it was my honor and pleasure to send Laura a letter notifying that she had passed the Vermont Bar Exam. Congrats Laura!
Now, back to my regular programming.
- There are none. It’s open book, open search engine, open-the-office-door-and-ask-a-colleague
- For fun, try to play Question 5 honest, but it’s not a requirement this week.
- Team entries welcome. Creative team names encouraged.
- Unless stated otherwise, the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct apply
- Please e-mail answers to email@example.com
- Please do not use the “comment” feature to submit your answers
- I will post the answers Monday, along with the week’s Honor Roll
- Please consider sharing the quiz with friends
- Hashtag & share: #fiveforfriday
Which is most accurate? A contingent fee:
- A. Must be fair
- B. Must be in a writing
- C. Must be in a writing signed by the client
- D. Must not be calculated until after the client’s expenses are deducted
Attorney called with an inquiry. I listened. I replied “It doesn’t matter that your client ‘initiated’ it, the rule still applies. And the fact that you cc’d your client on the e-mail is not the same as consent.”
What topic did Attorney call to discuss?
Fill in the blank.
In an advisory ethics opinion okaying the use of a particular type of technology, the Philadelphia Bar Association concluded that:
- “_________________ sites can be a beneficial source of funds allowing the public to assist in the assertion of valid legal claims that might otherwise go without recourse. Thus, great care should be taken to make sure that the initial development of such sites not affect the ability of subsequent persons to use such a source.”
North Carolina gained national attention for an amendment to its rule that went into effect last month. If Vermont were to follow the Tar Heel state’s lead, nearly all lawyers would have a duty that, today, only applies to a subset of the bar. It’s the rule that, right now, relates to:
- A. “Admiralty” lawyers being allowed to advertise their area of specialization
- B. Conflicts for defense attorneys who move from a public defender’s office to a state’s attorney’s office
- C. Television ads by lawyers who represent large classes of plaintiffs
- D. A prosecutor’s duty to disclose evidence that tends to negate the guilt of an accused.
Earlier this week, three news media organizations were named co-winners of the 2017 Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Journalism. The organizations were The Miami Herald, The McClatchy Group DC, and The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
The Pulitzer reflected their efforts on reporting a story that involved, among other things, Vladimir Putin, David Cameron, and offshore shell companies. The story came to light after a whistleblower “leaked” 11.5 million documents that a law firm had stored electronically. Review of the documents resulted in the law firm’s name partners being arrested and jailed on suspicion of money laundering.
By what name is the scandal better known?