Looking for the post on the Rolling Stones and cloud storage? It’s HERE.
Otherwise, keep it tuned to this post for FIve For Friday #7!
Reminder: the first rule is that are no rules. It’s an open book, open note, open search engine quiz. The exception: question#5. Try to play that one honestly. And, please send me your answers via email, not as comments to this post. My email address is email@example.com
Potential Client asks Attorney to represent her in a post-judgment divorce matter. Potential Client’s former spouse has not made court ordered child support payments in 5 months and is even further behind on spousal maintenance. As a result, Potential Client has little money and asks Attorney to represent her on a contingent fee basis. Under Vermont’s rules, which is most accurate?
Attorney and Potential Client
- A. may not enter into a contingent fee agreement
- B. may enter into a contingent fee agreement for both the child support and spousal maintenance issues, so long as the Court approves the reasonableness of the agreement
- C. may enter into a contingent fee agreement for both, so as long as the Court approves the reasonableness of the agreement with respect to the child support issue
- D. may enter into a contingent fee agreement for the spousal maintenance issue, but not the child support issue.
JD asks Lawyer to represent him in connection with a matter in which JD’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of Lawyer’s former client. Under Vermont’s rules, which is most accurate:
- A. Lawyer may not represent JD.
- B. Lawyer may not represent JD, but the conflict is not imputed to others in Lawyer’s firm.
- C. Lawyer may represent JD if the matter is not the same as or substantially related to the matter in which Lawyer represented JD.
- D. Lawyer may represent JD, but will have to withdraw if he is likely to be a necessary witness at any trial.
In Vermont’s attorney ethics world, what is defined as:
- “An agreement by a person to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated adequate information and explanation about the material risks of an reasonably available alternatives to the proposed course of conduct.”
Attorney represents the plaintiff in a civil suit that is pending in the Vermont Superior Court. Attorney receives material from defense counsel in response to a discovery request. Attorney reasonably believes that some of the material that she received was inadvertently produced.
Which is most accurate under Vermont’s ethics rules:
- A. Attorney must notify defense counsel of the inadvertent production
- B. Attorney must notify defense counsel of the inadvertent production and must abide by any instructions to return/destroy the material
- C. Attorney must notify defense counsel and her client of the inadvertent production, and must not return/destroy the material absent her client’s consent.
- D. Attorney may notify defense counsel, but only after consultation with her client as to Attorney’s duties under the rules.
Over the past month, many Americans binge-watched a show that included (1) prosecutors who may or may not have violated their duty to produce exculpatory evidence; (2) a defense attorney who had his investigator extract a detailed confession from his client, shared the confession with detectives, then chose not to attend an interview at which he knew the detectives would question the client; and (3) a prosecutor who resigned as a result of a sexting scandal.
Name the show.